>> % <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 1>> /Contents [105 0 R 106 0 R 107 0 R] )8Z^?w|A=$;~j0>O
amY!lW8wU(15nRhqN4^/U2N$NZ@YHN8. endobj /Type /Page endstream /Resources 80 0 R
PDF ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY DISPOSITION FOR PETITIONER - Michigan A motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) is properly granted to the moving party when the affidavits and documentary evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, show that there is no genuine dispute over any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. /Contents [61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] 0000058667 00000 n
/Contents [162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R] Disposition of the human remains and described in this notice to a requestor may occur on or after May 17, 2023. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj
PDF EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN APRIL DEBOER et al. ~,=&ECa
nt{h4KDZ]D4]^bH{qu5j,xyv /Type /Page /ModDate (D:20130815133913-04'00') This statute states that a motion for summary disposition is appropriate where the ".
PDF COA 360163 BRIAN MCLAIN V RICHARD LOBERT Opinion - Per Curiam /Parent 4 0 R 30 0 obj The trial court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary disposition and finding, as a matter of law, that the hazardous condition was open and obvious. In most television shows and movies about civil (non-criminal) lawsuits, the case is resolved after a dramatic trial. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Prev 239 0 R
>> hbbd``b`$s@`.G@j 0000002117 00000 n
summary disposition, and attended a case evaluation mediation, the Debtor's attorney withdrew as counsel. 0000002715 00000 n
4 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << MCR 2.116 (C)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). -)j]/|q?AH}x77`V OX@hY7bl)'wS CSP{KL`9>K]K)+h%~V+s51:e;rSD >>
0000000556 00000 n
endobj /Contents [179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R] /CropBox [0 0 612 792]
PDF State of Michigan /CropBox [0 0 612 792] hbbd``b`$g@9Hpj,Ft?? /Next 48 0 R <> /Type /Page /Parent 4 0 R /Length 243 0 R endstream
endobj
62 0 obj
<>
endobj
63 0 obj
<>
endobj
64 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>>
endobj
65 0 obj
<>
endobj
66 0 obj
[/ICCBased 71 0 R]
endobj
67 0 obj
<>
endobj
68 0 obj
<>
endobj
69 0 obj
<>stream
<< endobj >> MCR 2.116 (G)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). at 119-120. /Type /Page MCR 2.116 (B)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). Defendant moved for summary disposition under both MCR 2.116(C)(7) and MCR 2.116(C)(10). /Type /Page Hb```"vgA B&K+#0P P3T0lgR`fsUgi& 0 d
endstream
endobj
42 0 obj
104
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 21 0 R
/Resources 27 0 R
/Contents 33 0 R
/MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/Rotate 0
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ]
/Font << /TT2 29 0 R /TT4 31 0 R /TT6 34 0 R >>
/ExtGState << /GS1 36 0 R >>
/ColorSpace << /Cs6 32 0 R >>
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -558 -307 2000 1026 ]
/FontName /BOLLPF+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 160
/FontFile2 38 0 R
>>
endobj
29 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 148
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 333 333 500 0 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500
500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 0 0 0 444 0 722 667 667 722 611
556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722 556 0 667 556 611 722 722
944 722 722 0 333 0 333 0 500 0 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500
278 278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500
500 444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 444
444 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /BOLLNE+TimesNewRoman
/FontDescriptor 30 0 R
>>
endobj
30 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ]
/FontName /BOLLNE+TimesNewRoman
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 94
/XHeight 0
/FontFile2 37 0 R
>>
endobj
31 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 85
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 722 0 722 0 667 611 778 778 389 0 0 667 944 722 778 611 0 722
556 667 722 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /BOLLPF+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/FontDescriptor 28 0 R
>>
endobj
32 0 obj
[
/ICCBased 40 0 R
]
endobj
33 0 obj
<< /Length 2560 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
stream
How to fill out Michigan Defendant's Motion For Summary Disposition? /Parent 4 0 R endobj [/ICCBased 14 0 R] 0000001527 00000 n
F9 )PAI\m1dO,( 48MT H(!%)+W0"`I%+BP6,za
"SID86Z=x&'VR9Hc3?~ dy; fv8}\k1q 4\bi1 !FufRsSn`RUkXX,JLHB[RwSQ?.57kG2_;>[pm: h?35~x(?bEQ83 TnxuB3BerHG;+=
dQYNR4){UDg I2V"|l[ 8Pd
Motion for Summary Disposition in Michigan - Avvo >> /Annots [] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /Type /Page 0000002046 00000 n
When presented with a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4), the Tribunal must consider any and all endobj
PDF State of Michigan Court of Appeals >> 47 0 obj }I9U#bo-g*kzh$So&F}UL'!Y.HRy[r6MtQkj>lm9NBQlI";N4 _}yY=iz6m`L V+2Il[nopm
=InMf4+5y&$L7O"3e/6mwEi(o}u /CropBox [0 0 612 792] <>/Shading<<>>/XObject<<>>/ColorSpace<>/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> >> /Parent 4 0 R 0000006151 00000 n
(a) At any time after a respondent's answer has been filed, the respondent or the Director may make a motion for summary disposition of any or all allegations contained in the Order Instituting Proceedings.If the Director has not completed presentation of his or her case-in-chief, a motion for summary disposition shall be made only with permission of the Administrative Law Judge. B*:xDw{.Z*ZZr`P%GaSSK;YE,2c-5Ds 0Oe-)+sS
%(@NQS{Z8Q7-| $i In short, although the Michigan Court of Appeals will consider an appeal of a denial of summary disposition after a jury trial, such review in the Sixth Circuit is far more limited, available only in cases in which the summary judgment denial involves a "purely legal" issue. >> MCR 2.116 (B)(1) (amended eff 1/2/20). We review de novo a trial court's decision to grant or deny summary disposition under 4 0 obj /Parent 4 0 R 0000002754 00000 n
endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> /Resources 104 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] Every template is prepared and updated by state-accredited legal professionals. 7$W6
z$nR#]#7! stream
~1)zfq(5Vy>. /Contents [77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R] /Contents [65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R] 54 0 obj >> /Annots [] appeals an order from the trial court granting Michigan Health and Wellness Center ("Plaintiff") partial summary disposition. /Resources 129 0 R %PDF-1.4 <<
Tips for Filing Interlocutory Appeals in the Michigan Court of Appeals Litigation Corner: What's a Motion for Summary Disposition or Motion /Parent 4 0 R
r"+YC4H
CIIWPC
a`SW97$m
qG%*hrVz:> Q:&1.yY-oOYX1t7l(BLrjf v /Annots [] << e7;E U48R@Rn````HH7w%i.
PDF Opinion Regarding Collateral Estoppel Effect of State Court Judgment in /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj Hearing At Least 28 Days After Service of Claim. MCR 2.119 (A)(1)(d) (amended eff 1/2/20). Silberstein v Pro-Golf of America, Inc, 278 Mich App 446, 457; 750 NW2d 615 (2008). 0000082746 00000 n
mue#n.$eR,c8i!HRF_>q!9XNR,Kd$$GBR8EA}p"PWsL6=*;1:l )^%&~+e?F6x
J#{, *SFi,P|M+Ctf>3{qbPTXp5Lyn,&u{~ Q/$__'{O(s 5>Ok The service of process was insufficient. xwTS7PkhRH
H. << /Annots [] << /Type /Page (B) Motion. endobj p[m{.ib@;L`3YBJOCyjZ2.Q"n@Y.HH,jw18V"3mh,k!. /Parent 4 0 R 34 0 obj /Parent 4 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] QYkPz.
PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - State Bar of Michigan 31 0 obj (_PAGE25) 219 0 R (_PAGE26) 220 0 R (_PAGE27) 221 0 R (_PAGE28) 222 0 R (_PAGE29) 223 0 R << endobj Johnson v Wayne Co, 213 Mich App 143, 149; 540 NW2d 66 (1995); In re Peterson, 193 Mich App 257, 261; 483 NW2d 624 (1992). /Type /Pages /Type /Page <>/Shading<<>>/XObject<<>>/ColorSpace<>/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> endobj hUk0W=$P /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 0
purchased from his now-deceased brother in 2009. /Resources 186 0 R 0000000923 00000 n
/CropBox [0 0 612 792] x+ |
/Resources 108 0 R endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] The Court of Claims denied defendant's motion for summary disposition, holding that plaintiff's allegations adequately pleaded a claim in avoidance of governmental immunity because the facts as alleged may support a finding of gross negligence. 10 0 obj /Annots [] >> /Title (Page 37) |e=+1C2gaX`
7#d]S18{&zLzq+F7 =v-Ik#AE^'#J@Ie9[Q(952,MBleCQ;)5P U'SkB5-sf@\LwvenFl 8bLNIUp0-,]#y-}T5dOt~ =FK ME0?\.g0VXO/qD 3VbFsl?uG*kYfC{XrIqR xb```f``)cBBk,o"we{00\/@u&NPbu`. Rule 2.119 - Motion Practice (A) Form of Motions. Both parties concede that summary disposition for lack of ripeness is properly considered pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), and even if the trial court erroneously granted 1 See Braun v Ann Arbor Charter Twp, 262 Mich App 154, 160; 683 NW2d 755 (2004) (expressly stating that summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) was proper when an >> Most appeals in the Michigan Court of Appeals are appeals as of right after the entry of a final judgment or order. evidence conclusive weight and granted summary disposition in favor of Velardo under MCR 2.116(C)(9). 3 0 obj Summary Disposition3, p2) Petitioner makes several arguments as to why it should not be held liable for the assessed use tax and interest. /Type /Page Unless made during a hearing or trial, a motion must be in writing. /Resources 170 0 R A request for dismissal without prejudice under MCL 600.2912c must be made by motion under Michigan Court Rules 2.116 and 2.119. Civil Procedure. (Plf. Summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) is appropriate when "[t]he opposing party has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted." "A motion brought under subrule (C)(8) tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint solely on the basis of the pleadings." 0
/Length 246 0 R /Parent 4 0 R x,{#juXauNCAsMm@6+ yNUa]po-JiqG.u8nM`Ed?^AvvU
Dispositive Motions - Michigan <> 36 0 obj
PDF S M DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS L - michigan.gov /Type /Page << In contrast, summary disposition is appropriately granted in favor of the opposing party under MCR 2.116(I)(2) "when it appears to the court that the opposing party, rather than the moving party, is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Sherry v East Suburban Football League, 292 Mich App 23, 34; 807 NW2d 859 (2011). /Parent 4 0 R MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION Plaintiff first argues that the trial court erred by granting defendant's motion for summary disposition in regards to his claims for abuse of process and defamation. /Contents [158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R] ^ (:-/X_6N>O {g}Q[%{&Ee( {{{;}#tp8_\. << 2 0 obj 12 0 obj When reviewing a grant of summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8), a court considers all well-pled factual allegations in support of the claim as true and construes them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Ci0wMLA} 24 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] They wish to marry each other and would if Michigan law allowed them to do so. endobj endobj 0000060399 00000 n
7 0 obj H\U PG^ /!^2TDDD(%xkxxD#jtBV4krKJv^w_ xb $NNX. /TrimBox [0 0 612 792]
PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - Justia Law 1 0 obj
In a written opinion and order entered on August 7, 2018, the trial court granted defendants' motion for summary disposition. endobj /Annots [] /Type /Page A party may move for dismissal of or judgment on all or part of a claim. 0000046379 00000 n
MCR 2.116 (C)(2) (amended eff 1/2/20). endobj endobj In . I. >> If the defendant actually receives service of process within the life of the summons, the fact that the manner of service was improper is not grounds for dismissal. 50 0 obj 1 0 obj /Count 37 A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(7) is appropriate where there has been an "assignment or other disposition of the claim before commencement of the action." MCR 2.116(C)(7). If one party files a motion, the other party will have a chance to file a written response. << /Title (Page 36) x%10+.q[$HD7.&sGcOfQllHT~)qP
v#7L|"xufl6{vi8@WV
/Dests 6 0 R Eb ]vioJc".$d\6&>?. endstream
endobj
199 0 obj
<>
endobj
200 0 obj
<>/Font<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>>
endobj
201 0 obj
<>stream
<< MCR 2.116(G)(1)(c) (amended eff 9/1/17). 37 0 obj << stream
/Resources 178 0 R endobj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] endobj << /Contents [134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R] /Resources 121 0 R 19 0 obj But occasionally, a party may wish to challenge an interlocutory order - such as a discovery order, an denying summary disposition, or an order regarding a pretrial motion in limine. 0000001175 00000 n
/Resources 153 0 R Robertson v Blue Water Oil Co, 268 Mich App 588, 592; 708 NW2d 749 (2005). 44 0 obj SUMMARY DISPOSITION . 41 0 obj 0000002339 00000 n
/Names 2 0 R 2017-05-15T15:53:30-04:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22017-05-17T00:39:46-04:00 /Contents [130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R] 17 0 obj
PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - State Bar of Michigan /Parent 4 0 R 42 0 obj /Resources 56 0 R <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 2>> /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 52 0 R /Resources 161 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Filter /FlateDecode MCR 2.116(C)(7). /Annots [] <>stream << 14 0 obj % m9j&Y/?iTl8::jQ0Hs P4H0bb?8cCa'@aTgb`, qr /Parent 4 0 R
PDF State of Michigan Court of Appeals 218 0 obj
<>stream
xZnw 7Ew>{r"e%A_k4rNv h\3|$7|#knNO|ipMEa=>=ys--S}>=9'?NOipy^5`~%3oxmpMMVJh8-)]-{,Z*=5!=$xup,V lqf|._aWZot5Oc+*ltFR{rF4l]hkmrA.,%&-LY\8,&|i]9c?s)%5mXn{4pRh;nE>LCe8}e9xVJaqpDfQomOyI[\V} /CropBox [0 0 612 792] @Rt CXCP%CBH@Rf[(t
CQhz#0 Zl`O828.p|OX A court may grant a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) if "[t]he >> /Type /Page If competing requests for disposition are lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1 A trial court's decision on a motion for summary disposition is reviewed de novo. /Resources 149 0 R
/Kids [46 0 R] 1 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] yLnp-a/|St&P;`K1!V\A"h\1JU}TXH'J]ap{&96E@R`3KYcpx.vee'S}7]
Mich Court Rules Chap 2. Civil Procedure - Michigan endobj << 3 Respondent's Motion for Summary Disposition p. 3 . %%EOF
(_PAGE11) 204 0 R (_PAGE12) 205 0 R (_PAGE13) 206 0 R (_PAGE14) 207 0 R (_PAGE15) 208 0 R <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 3>> << A motion for summary disposition may be based on one or more of these grounds, and must specify the grounds on which it is based: The court lacks jurisdiction over the person or property. >> /Resources 133 0 R 0000001036 00000 n
/Annots [] %%EOF
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI] endobj LR 2.119(B)(2). A. Motions for Summary Disposition Under MCR 2.116(C)(10), a motion for summary disposition will be granted if the documentary evidence demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. /Resources 72 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R
PDF Coa 360607 Billie Steven Montgomery V Estate of Bud E Montgomery << 24 0 obj
<<
/Linearized 1
/O 26
/H [ 820 216 ]
/L 107214
/E 85574
/N 7
/T 106616
>>
endobj
xref
24 19
0000000016 00000 n
/Parent 4 0 R /Resources 60 0 R << See terms of use for more details. /Parent 4 0 R /Annots [] MCR 2.119 (A)(2) (amended eff 1/2/20). /Filter [/FlateDecode] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 0000002672 00000 n
affidavits. /Annots [] MCR 2.116 (C)(4) (amended eff 1/2/20). /Parent 4 0 R There is nothing in the record showing that the trial court had authorized or given permission to plaintiff to file the supplemental brief. endobj /Type /Page /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] RDM Holdings, LTD v Continental Plastics Co, 2. the Michigan Court of Appeals addressed a motion for summary disposition filed under . /Resources 182 0 R <> If in fact the monthly payments which it was agreed would be received by the Plaintiff . /Annots [] /Type /Page /Type /Page /Type /Page But many civil lawsuits are resolved not by trial but by motion. MCR 2.116 (G) (1) (a) (i) indicates: (i) a written motion under this rule with supporting brief and any affidavits must be filed and served at least 21 days before the time set for the hearing. xkoF{~Ir 8(~#]J3$%,opDkf=-kzu2*trrUbqy}]bx2]Y,ap(3#-^8z5X'YeJ',E+1yW3X1)
r6X'}]fWUslr\Q]S9`,U,E'PCyfGrAcMk lNxn{SXzN4/_\ ~zb_m4KVbea
A(ed8Akh#dmj>8Vqe|F;:*F~J|Ma=7:a:n]NeJILIO'eL$Q%x>2 :ay"sq#B$R- Vk>54gI ]?NziQ}k|]]6(":>L[P$H}Px0((ex :=**ajS&JSy|eFe 3 0 obj
endstream
endobj
53 0 obj
<< /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 39466 /Length1 63100 >>
stream
/Length 245 0 R
Rule 4.201 - Summary Proceedings to Recover Possession of - Casetext /Contents [191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R] /Parent 4 0 R They own a home together and are the parents of the minor plaintiffs in this case. 5 0 obj /Parent 4 0 R /Contents [49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R] 0000001571 00000 n
PDF STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS - State Bar of Michigan (Id.) least in part based on the standard for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). /CropBox [0 0 612 792]
Dispositive Motions - ICLE /Resources 113 0 R << /Parent 4 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792]
PDF Court of Appeals Order Affirming Summary Disposition /Resources 165 0 R Hb```f``$20 P9 <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Tabs/S/StructParents 4>> An appellate court "review [s] de novo a decision on a motion for summary disposition." Greenville Lafayette, LLC v. >> ,ceT7@ $
endstream
endobj
57 0 obj
163
endobj
46 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 31 0 R
/Resources 47 0 R
/Contents 52 0 R
/Thumb 16 0 R
/MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
/Rotate 0
>>
endobj
47 0 obj
<<
/ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ]
/Font << /TT2 49 0 R /TT4 51 0 R >>
/ExtGState << /GS1 55 0 R >>
>>
endobj
48 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -568 -307 2000 1007 ]
/FontName /ANOIDI+TimesNewRoman
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 94
/XHeight 0
/FontFile2 53 0 R
>>
endobj
49 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 151
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 500 0 778 0 333 333 0 0 250 333 250 278 500 500 500 500
500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 0 0 0 0 0 722 667 667 722 611 556
722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722 722 556 0 667 556 611 722 722 944
0 722 611 333 0 333 0 500 0 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278
278 500 278 778 500 500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500
444 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 333 444 444
0 0 1000 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /ANOIDI+TimesNewRoman
/FontDescriptor 48 0 R
>>
endobj
50 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/Ascent 891
/CapHeight 656
/Descent -216
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -558 -307 2000 1026 ]
/FontName /ANOIEK+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/ItalicAngle 0
/StemV 160
/FontFile2 54 0 R
>>
endobj
51 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/FirstChar 32
/LastChar 85
/Widths [ 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 722 0 722 0 667 611 778 778 389 0 0 667 944 722 778 611 0 722
556 667 722 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/BaseFont /ANOIEK+TimesNewRoman,Bold
/FontDescriptor 50 0 R
>>
endobj
52 0 obj
<< /Length 2344 /Filter /FlateDecode >>
stream
<> endobj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /Count 37 /Annots [] 9 0 obj III. Genuine issues of material fact remain on the issue of impossibility of performance, as the Plaintiff does not claim that the $1800 payments were for rent of the building/real property. *1 J "6DTpDQ2(C"QDqpIdy~kg} LX Xg` l pBF|l *? Y"1 P\8=W%O4M0J"Y2Vs,[|e92se'9`2&ctI@o|N6 (.sSdl-c(2-y H_/XZ.$&\SM07#1Yr fYym";8980m-m(]v^DW~
emi ]P`/ u}q|^R,g+\Kk)/C_|Rax8t1C^7nfzDpu$/EDL L[B@X! /Type /Page 73 0 obj
<>stream
/Type /Page endobj 0000000627 00000 n
Disclaimer: The materials and information on this website do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. /Contents [195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R] /Pages 4 0 R /Resources 76 0 R stream
(_PAGE20) 214 0 R (_PAGE21) 215 0 R (_PAGE22) 216 0 R (_PAGE23) 217 0 R (_PAGE24) 218 0 R
PDF State of Michigan in The Third Judicial Circuit Court Angela Steffke /Annots [] endobj /Parent 4 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 0000001015 00000 n
3 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] h[K)2(D@ 9{m3:3GURqXd,gNu?|yswTwwQc7?c0uz>70fn;_7*)YO&&;LwM]e_g(/*&~] BK\aL90vVhdXkm,oS3@ Xb:>`>q3 ~f!,$
PDF Federal Register/ Vol. 88, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 2023 / Notices PDF COA 359646 TIFFANY SHANTEL ROBINSON V JANET ELAINE SZCZOTKA Opinion Summary Disposition - courts.michigan.gov /Parent 4 0 R endobj /Resources 190 0 R 0000001349 00000 n
endobj 21 0 obj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] trailer
Lawrence v. Burdi, 314 Mich. App. 203 | Casetext Search + Citator << endobj /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] /TrimBox [0 0 612 792] 52 0 obj 2 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 1 0 obj 48 0 obj 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R] 13 0 obj 0
/Resources 157 0 R >> >>
Rule 2.119 - Motion Practice, Mich. Ct. R. 2.119 - Casetext 0000002382 00000 n
2 0 obj /Prev 47 0 R The court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter. 0000005389 00000 n
5@)=[$.YrG[QM+ksEnuG_*QnD{?#rK~Nj.ByouVXM[WV{zP17`X9Yelw)X[z8obV:; '
*#(,VkBecO(d*=;oHY/7vg9Xw6{lR? aGM 7w(Ha]ao}DfJYNob[z~{qZMSa-}su?z;
yq=3PkUPkSu/If\cM",^|!{o!.^7E=w'o*U>4 rQ'YOvO^7mwyHNO#0Icgh/[}XTmhy-[nQ07OT,E5,lEMvH; SS-ji\,+hOOn\nK+j^^ aisM+XW\(X;]S~sob_\(3mXt$0
A):PU?q\Su,X%KSYKUb)[tLb_J%gAB}:fLGJT[>,IYlkSBvJ4hr5[2j#7jEO;_v3t
Desmos Linear Equations Activity,
Simeon High School Basketball Alumni,
Articles S